Chasercommunity - Forum

Like Alvar said I was away from my PC to prepare dinner and when i came back he
has already asked me on msn if I can play in place of Milton in that CW and 3 mins
later I played there. At least Alvar knows to appreciate that and wrote a reasonable reply.
And this match was not about the question - who is better Alvar or me it was just a cw.

Just to give other ppl an overview of this cw:
Rules were:
No bd
no flashes
timelimit - 5mins
nades were allowed

In contrast to BTB we were rushing almost every single round and used once only 1 nade unlike them.
In my opinion nading is most of the time just annoying and you dont need any skill at all for it.
I wont sound like an idiot but it isnt easy to play against other people, who have pings between 150 - 200.
Ok sometimes your pings also decreased again to acceptable rates but I got a few ss where you have both pings of 200.
And a CW against guys like you doesnt show anything about my real skills.
I dont regard this match as a criterion for showing skills or as an opportunity of
judging other people you dont really know.

And be aware of the fact that each single DD member could take out your whole clan.
ps: You probably wont remember cause i was playing with another nick, but I was
able to pwn 3 of you BTB guys alone without any problems so please take care in
future what you say about other people you think to know though you actually do not.

So... I think we don't need a rematch, except we get 6 years to train our skills.

loooooooooool lmao you dont need to play Chaser for such a long time for becoming
good in it. For example there are guys who re playing it for 4 or 5 years but are
still not very good in it and on the other hand there are people who just started
about 1 year ago and play however on the same level and almost as good like more
experienced players do.

I can recommend you to take some months and practise with the best and you will
see fast improvements in your skills and experience. Then challenge (if possible
also with lower pings... ) us again and I am sure it will be an
interesting game.

In the end, I agree with you Schaf at least in 2 points.
On the whole it was a nice and funny match and of course a CW vs KmA would be an interesting and new challenge.

i can not - and i dont want to - answer these questions seriously.

Do u think anything i said was mentioned seriously(without th fact that it was funny and that we lost awful) ? So, anything that is written here is Unnecessary cuz i am only joking when i saying that alvar or milton or nafets or who ever would be better then another... i don't think that i can make a juuge about it...

that is a good starting if u want to flame someone..

I do not want to flame ANYBODY...

better write down results, not some dummies

Better read befor posting -.-

Nafets wrote:No bd
no flashes
timelimit - 5mins
nades were allowed

u all can forget to play vs kMa with rules like that.. nade party @ hall? camping @hall? and no bd?

realy skillt.....

suggy wrote:

Nafets wrote:No bd
no flashes
timelimit - 5mins
nades were allowed

u all can forget to play vs kMa with rules like that.. nade party @ hall? camping @hall? and no bd?

realy skillt.....

i've seen better excuses coming from my little bro.
we could play with no nades, no flashes, timelimit as you want, backdoor allowed ( i find funny that everyone says backdooring is for noobs, or when some idiots say " NO BD ! " rotfl ), etc .

so, why having a clan in this game if you refuse a single challenge coming from a decent ( better ? ) clan ?

suggy wrote:

Nafets wrote:No bd
no flashes
timelimit - 5mins
nades were allowed

u all can forget to play vs kMa with rules like that.. nade party @ hall? camping @hall? and no bd?

realy skillt.....

these were just some random rules we made up before the CW. BTB wanted the nades allowed.

and like nafets said, we have been rushing every round anyway. so if we will make a CW vs you, you can feel free to set up your own rules, we really dont care

BTB wanted the nades allowed.

yes, u all know i love nading ^^
But i only threw 4- or 5-times

Istvan wrote:i've seen better excuses coming from my little bro.

lol?

suggy wrote:

Istvan wrote:i've seen better excuses coming from my little bro.

lol?

does that " lol? " means that you didnt know i have a lil bro ?

or

does that " lol? " means that you have nothing better to say, and that you agree with the fact that what u said before is a silly excuse to not play against us ?

it meens it was a foolish complain.

it wasn an excuse! just a post.